Another One Bites the Dust
Part of my mission in life is to warn cancer patients
about alleged "cures" that are built on deceptive
claims rather than facts. Good cancer treatments are
not a dime a dozen, and to prove that they really
work requires long and costly clinical trials. It
is so much easier to do some questionable test tube
experiments and then announce the imminent end of
the dread disease.
Many people associate these dubious "cures" with
the worst kinds of "alternative medicine." But orthodox
medicine should look in its own backyard. A case in
point is Erbitux, manufactured by ImClone
Systems of New York.
You may have heard of Erbitux under its former
name, IMC-C225. In July, it was touted
on cover of Business Week. The New York
Times called it the "two billion dollar
molecule." Wall Street stock analysts
posted "buy" ratings and the stock soared.
In 17 years, mind you, the company had never turned
a profit and had just three million dollars in quarterly
revenues. Yet, this fall, ImClone's capitalization
reached $5.5 billion, more than many countries.
The company predicted that the Food and Drug Administration
(FDA) would soon approve its application to market
Erbitux. Yet, on December 28, they announced
that the FDA had rejected its application. "In other
words," James Surowiecki wrote in the New Yorker,
"the agency would not even consider the drug for
approval , much less approve it." (1/28/02)
But even worse news came a few days later. ImClone
had apparently known all along that the FDA had serious
questions about the way its clinical trials were designed
and conducted. ImClone's stock started to head south.
Shareholders started law suits and Congress began
to investigate. The stock, which had topped $75 in
December, headed for the basement. This Friday, ImClone
announced that it was under scrutiny by securities
regulators and the Justice Department as well. Its
drop another 16 percent, to $16.50 per share.
So, how did ImClone get so big? Memorial Sloan-Kettering's
Leonard Saltz, MD, supervised the clinical trials.
Vincent DeVita, former director of the NCI, sat on
the board, as did the drug's inventor, John Mendelsohn,
president of M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Mendelsohn
is also on the board-and audit committee-of Enron.
"It's a coincidence," he said last week.
In September, Bristol Myers Squibb bought 20 percent
of ImClone for a billion dollars. Wall Street
analysts relied on these big names for validation.
"They didn't have much else to go on," said the New
Yorker. "They couldn't examine ImClone's track
record-it had none... So they looked to the reputational
capital of the people who were telling the ImClone
story."
The New Yorker aptly summarized the situation
as "an arrogant, inexperienced biotech company with
almost no revenues, pinning its hopes on a drug that
no one on Wall Street could effectively evaluate."
According to the magazine, DeVita and Mendelsohn "have
a professional and financial stake in ImClone's success."
Mendelsohn sold more than six million dollars' worth
of ImClone stock in October. But "reputation
is no substitute for knowledge."
I would suggest that the situation with Erbitux
is not unique. FDA has been lax in approving many
drugs based on scanty data. Phase III trials are practically
a thing of the past, and radiation and surgery often
get a free ride. It is rare that cancer treatments
have been adequately documented through rigorous trials.
Perhaps this latest fiasco will stir up the Congress
and the media to do their jobs, and, looking beyond
the flim-flam, demand hard data for the next "cure"
that comes down the pike.
I continue to enjoy sprouting broccoli, radish and
mung bean. But an astute readers reminded me that
raw alfalfa and mung bean sprouts might not
be so healthful. Experiments done in monkeys 20 years
ago implicated L-Canavanine sulfate found in raw sprouts
in a lupus-like condition. (Cooking eliminated the
potential threat.) I would therefore suggest avoiding
alfalfa sprout and cooking mung sprouts (as is routinely
done in chow mein and other Asian dishes).
--Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.

IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER
The news and other items in this newsletter are
intended for informational purposes only. Nothing
in this newsletter is intended to be a substitute
for professional medical advice.
|