Latest News & Updates...

Announcing publication of a book-length Moss Report on an exciting new form of cancer treatment: "Unleashing the Immune System: New Insights Into Cancer."

[CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFO]
 
Featured Articles
Joomla Featured Articles Module by DART Creations
Possible Related Items
The Chemo Concession Persists - Part II Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Digg
Sunday, 04 July 2010



Last week we began an article on how the so-called "Chemotherapy Concession" has led to the more extensive (and expensive) use of drugs by oncologists. We conclude, with references, in this week's newsletter.



"In sum, far from limiting access," the changes under the law "actually increased the likelihood that lung cancer patients received chemotherapy," said Dr. Mireille Jacobson of the RAND Corporation, who was first author on the study. (Disclosure: I serve as a reviewer of scientific studies for RAND.)


The authors chose to focus on lung cancer because of the various treatment options, some of which are considerably more expensive than others. They found that doctors frequently switched drugs to choose the more expensive options. There was, for instance, an increased use of docetaxel (Taxotere), a drug for which oncologist get reimbursed about $2,500 per patient per month.


"The financial incentive seemed to have an effect where there's not strong evidence or more than one equally good treatment option," said Craig C. Earle, MD, of Toronto, one of the study authors.


Oncologists responded by treating a greater number of patients because they had been making so much money under the old system, Prof. Joseph P. Newhouse of Harvard University, another co-author, told the New York Times. "These markups were a substantial portion of their income" (Abelson 2010).


The bottom line is that some oncologists in private practice make crucial treatment decisions not based on medical necessity but on what is most profitable for themselves.


Oncologists are highly skilled professionals, who deserve our support and respect. However, the "chemotherapy concession" introduces a temptation for oncologists in private practice to prescribe according to their economic interests rather than the medical needs of their patients. This has no scientific or moral justification. Congress still needs to thoroughly investigate and fix this problem.





Signature
--Ralph W. Moss, Ph.D.



References:


Abelson, Reed. Doctors recouped cuts in Medicare pay, study finds. New York Times, June 16, 2010.


American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2010. Available at www.cancer.org


Jacobson M, Earle CC, Price M, Newhouse JP. How Medicare's payment cuts for cancer chemotherapy drugs changed patterns of treatment. Health Aff. 2010:hlthaff.2009.0563.


Facebook The Moss Reports is on Facebook (Get Connected)

Last Updated ( Sunday, 04 July 2010 )
 
< Prev   Next >
Main Menu
Home
Search
About Us
Latest News
Phone Consultations
Order Moss Reports
Where To Go?
Radiation Reports
Current Topic Reports
Cancer Advisor Blog
Newsletters & Articles
Newsletter Archives
Ralph's Media Center
Health Community
Books by Dr. Moss
What Experts Say
What Clients Say
Cancer News Feeds
Get Our Free Newsletter
Client Download Login
Moss Reports Audio Clips
start Player
Cancer Decisions Podcasts
Subscribe Today!
Podcast
Full Feed
Syndicate